CASE09 · Manufacturing · Chiller systems

Building monthly chiller operating plans from COP and seasonal demand

Hourly operating records support efficient-unit priority, monthly staging and chilled-water setpoints for 5°C and 12°C systems. Pump conditions are standardized so that equipment performance can be compared fairly.

01 · CASE ANALYSIS

Operating challenge

Outside the summer peak, the plant had operating capacity above the calculated requirement. Chillers of the same capacity showed different COPs, making performance-based sequencing preferable to an unexamined rotation schedule.

Different chilled-water outlet temperatures and pump flows made direct equipment comparison difficult. Cleanroom dehumidification during humid weather also limited how far water temperatures could be raised.

02 · CASE ANALYSIS

Data and comparison method

The analysis combined equipment specifications, hourly COP, monthly required and actual unit counts, outlet temperatures, pump power and water flows for the 5°C and 12°C systems.

COP is cooling output divided by chiller electrical input. The report proposes standardizing chilled-water flow to an AHRI-equivalent reference of 545 m³/h for a 1,000 RT machine, with cooling-water conditions also aligned between running units. This is the source report’s comparison reference, not a substitute for equipment-specific limits.

Operating criteria
CriterionSource approach
Equipment priorityRank chillers by monthly COP within each system
StagingCompare actual units with cooling-load-based required units
Flow reference1,000 RT → 545 m³/h chilled-water flow
Humidity constraintPreserve cleanroom dehumidification performance

03 · CASE ANALYSIS

Monthly operating strategy

Select higher-COP units first, add capacity according to required load and use seasonal setpoints. The 5°C system plan ranges from roughly 2–3 units in low-load periods to a maximum range of 6–12 in peak summer periods; the 12°C system uses roughly 2–3 and 5–6, respectively.

For the 5°C system, the proposed outlet range is about 5.5–7.0°C by season; the 12°C system uses approximately 12°C. Humid-season cleanroom requirements take priority.

04 · CASE ANALYSIS

Evidence and verification

The source gives a general operating rule that a 1°C increase in outlet setpoint may reduce chiller energy by approximately 2%. That rule is not a measured saving for this project.

The report does not provide confirmed annual savings after implementation. Validate the plan using cooling load, total cooling-system electricity, weather, production and cleanroom conditions.

Monthly plan ranges
SystemLow-load unitsSummer unitsOutlet setpoint
5°C circuitApproximately 2–3Peak range approximately 6–12Approximately 5.5–7.0°C seasonally
12°C circuitApproximately 2–3Approximately 5–6Approximately 12°C

05 · CASE ANALYSIS

Engineering lesson

Staging, setpoints and pump conditions should be coordinated. Comparing chiller COP without comparable water and load conditions can produce misleading operating priorities.

APPLY TO YOUR SITE

Connect your operating data to an actionable energy strategy.

Discuss the measurement boundary, data quality, operating constraints and verification approach for your facility.

Discuss your project All English cases